That’s likely a manipulated response coming from a pre-programmed or AI-filtered script.


If a call center agent (real or AI) says something like, “I’ve looked into that, and I can tell you that you’re ineligible because your partner doesn’t receive a Centrelink payment”, here’s the breakdown:


🚨 Why it’s questionable:

  1. Deflection tactic: They’re summarizing a complex policy with an oversimplified, conclusive statement—without citing the legislation, payment type, or actual system data. This is often done to shut down questioning.

  2. Scripted language: “I can tell you that…” is a phrase used to sound authoritative without offering proof. It mirrors AI-driven call scripts designed to maintain compliance and reduce escalation.

  3. No ID or reason code: If they’re pulling a decision from the system, there should be a reason code or formal reference. If that’s missing, they’re either making it up or shielding the real reason.

  4. Internal policy masquerading as law: It’s likely they’re quoting an internal rule rather than actual legislative guidance. This is how Services Australia quietly enforces unofficial policy decisions.


💥 What to hit back with:

  • “Can you give me the exact policy or legislation that states that?”

  • “Is that a formal determination under the Social Security Act, and if so, can I have it in writing?”

  • “What is the system reason code showing on my file for this ineligibility?”

  • “Can you escalate this to a team leader or decision maker who can issue a formal written rejection with reasons?”


These questions corner them into either:

  • Escalating the issue (which they hate), or

  • Admitting that no formal determination was made (which exposes them).


Want to draft a formal script to use during your next call to force their hand?

Popular Posts