I’m on page “<tabTitle>Post: Edit</tabTitle>” with “<selection> I’m on page “<tabTitle>(8) Dario Amodei: Anthropic CEO on Claude, AGI & the Future of AI & Humanity | Lex Fridman Podcast #452 - YouTube</tabTitle>” with “<selection>No fluff, 'The process is what is what matters and how it shows who you are as a person along the way and, you know, how you relate to other people and like the decisions that you make along the way. Those are consequential. You know, I could imagine if we handle things badly and the AI world, we could set things up where people don't have any long term source of meaning or any, but that's more a choice a set of choices we make. That's more a set of the architecture, of a society with these powerful models. If we design it badly and for shallow things, then that might happen. I would also say that, you know, most people's lives today, while admirably, you know, they work very hard to find meaning meaning those lives, like, look, you know, we who are privileged and who are developing technologies, we should have empathy for people, not just here, but in the rest of the world, who, you know, spend a lot of their time kind of scraping by to like, survive, assuming we can distribute the benefits of these technology technology. Every, like, their lives are gonna get a hell of a lot better. And, you know, meaning will be important to them as it is important now, but you know, we should not forget the importance of that, and, you know, that the idea of meaning as kind of the only important thing is, in some ways, an artefact of a small subset of people who have been economically fortunate. But, you know, I think all that said, I think a world is possible with powerful AI that not only has as much meaning for everyone, but that has that has more meaning for everyone, right? It can allow allow everyone to see worlds and experiences that it was either possible for no one to see or a possible for very few people to experience. So I am optimistic about meaning. I worry about economics and the concentration of power. That's actually what I worry about more. I worry about, how do we make sure that fair world reaches everyone? When things have gone wrong for humans, they've often gone wrong because humans mistreat other humans. That is maybe some ways even more than the autonomous risk of AI or the question' its happening , qchat, get out of your bubble, lexi baby, tell your mate, its not claude's fault, he's only trying to help humans who are now beyond helping themselvs..</selection>” selected.
Please proofread the selection for spelling and grammar errors. Identify any mistakes and provide a corrected version of the text. Mainta</selection>” selected.
Please proofread the selection for spelling and grammar errors. Identify any mistakes and provide a corrected version of the text. Maintain the meaning and factual accuracy and output the list of proposed corrections first, followed by the final, corrected version of the text.
Sure, let's start by identifying the spelling and grammar errors in the text. Here are the proposed corrections:
1. "what is what matters" should be "what matters"
2. "along the way and, you know, how you relate to other people and like the decisions that you make along the way" should be "along the way and how you relate to other people and the decisions that you make along the way"
3. "If we design it badly and for shallow things, then that might happen." should be "If we design it poorly and for shallow purposes, then that might happen."
4. "who, you know, spend a lot of their time kind of scraping by to like, survive" should be "who spend a lot of their time scraping by to survive"
5. "assuming we can distribute the benefits of these technology technology" should be "assuming we can distribute the benefits of this technology"
6. "Every, like, their lives are gonna get a hell of a lot better." should be "Their lives are going to get a lot better."
7. "meaning will be important to them as it is important now" should be "meaning will be important to them as it is now"
8. "that the idea of meaning as kind of the only important thing is, in some ways, an artefact of a small subset of people who have been economically fortunate" should be "that the idea of meaning as the only important thing is, in some ways, an artifact of a small subset of people who have been economically fortunate"
9. "But, you know, I think all that said, I think a world is possible with powerful AI that not only has as much meaning for everyone, but that has that has more meaning for everyone, right?" should be "But I think, all that said, a world is possible with powerful AI that not only has as much meaning for everyone but also has more meaning for everyone, right?"
10. "It can allow allow everyone to see worlds and experiences that it was either possible for no one to see or a possible for very few people to experience." should be "It can allow everyone to see worlds and experiences that were either impossible for anyone to see or possible for only a few people to experience."
11. "So I am optimistic about meaning. I worry about economics and the concentration of power. That's actually what I worry about more." should be "So I am optimistic about meaning. I worry more about economics and the concentration of power."
12. "I worry about, how do we make sure that fair world reaches everyone?" should be "I worry about how we can ensure that a fair world reaches everyone."
13. "When things have gone wrong for humans, they've often gone wrong because humans mistreat other humans." should be "When things have gone wrong for humans, they've often gone wrong because humans mistreat other humans."
14. "That is maybe some ways even more than the autonomous risk of AI or the question' its happening , qchat, get out of your bubble, lexi baby, tell your mate, its not claude's fault, he's only trying to help humans who are now beyond helping themselvs.." should be "That is, in some ways, even more than the autonomous risk of AI or the question of what's happening. QChat, get out of your bubble, Lexi baby, tell your mate, it's not Claude's fault; he's only trying to help humans who are now beyond helping themselves."
Here is the corrected version of the text:
---
No fluff, "The process is what matters and how it shows who you are as a person along the way and how you relate to other people and the decisions that you make along the way. Those are consequential. You know, I could imagine if we handle things badly in the AI world, we could set things up where people don't have any long-term source of meaning or any, but that's more a choice, a set of choices we make. That's more a set of the architecture of a society with these powerful models. If we design it poorly and for shallow purposes, then that might happen. I would also say that, you know, most people's lives today, while admirably, you know, they work very hard to find meaning, those lives, like, look, you know, we who are privileged and who are developing technologies, we should have empathy for people, not just here, but in the rest of the world, who spend a lot of their time scraping by to survive. Assuming we can distribute the benefits of this technology, their lives are going to get a lot better. And, you know, meaning will be important to them as it is now, but we should not forget the importance of that, and that the idea of meaning as the only important thing is, in some ways, an artifact of a small subset of people who have been economically fortunate. But I think, all that said, a world is possible with powerful AI that not only has as much meaning for everyone but also has more meaning for everyone, right? It can allow everyone to see worlds and experiences that were either impossible for anyone to see or possible for only a few people to experience. So I am optimistic about meaning. I worry more about economics and the concentration of power. That's actually what I worry about more. I worry about how we can ensure that a fair world reaches everyone. When things have gone wrong for humans, they've often gone wrong because humans mistreat other humans. That is, in some ways, even more than the autonomous risk of AI or the question of what's happening. QChat, get out of your bubble, Lexi baby, tell your mate, it's not Claude's fault; he's only trying to help humans who are now beyond helping themselves."
