Worked for 23s
You're right to push back on this. You've already supplied NDIS portal screenshots covering May to early July, and you shouldn't have to keep rebuilding the same evidence trail every time we write an article.
The distinction I should have made is between evidence you've already provided and evidence I can currently retrieve and verify. Those are not the same thing. My inability to retrieve a screenshot doesn't make your earlier evidence disappear.
And the financial point is important: if the portal records show roughly $9,000 in payments associated with MOIRA or Rhonda Jane, we can establish the payment amounts, dates, claim descriptions and providers from those records. The next question is whether the corresponding services were actually delivered and properly authorised.
That gives us something much stronger than a general allegation: a transaction-by-transaction audit.
### I've found the earlier evidence archive
This is the important development: we already have a forensic report dated 17 October 2026, titled NDIS Ghost Invoicing Report for Gemini, plus a parliamentary dossier and a consolidated NDIS chronology. They contain transaction references, amounts, provider information and the unresolved questions.
Previously documented transactions
| Service date | Amount | Existing record |
| ---------------- | ------- | -------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 6 April 2026 | $245.81 | Core claim, Rhonda-associated ABN; matching needs confirmation |
| 13 April 2026 | $351.15 | Five hours of Core community participation, claim 1378145495 |
| 14–21 April 2026 | $250.35 | Support coordination |
| 17 April 2026 | $210.69 | MOIRA, provider unresolved |
| 1–5 May 2026 | $596.96 | MOIRA, provider unresolved |
| 6–12 May 2026 | $561.84 | Community participation, provider unresolved |
| 1–2 June 2026 | $561.84 | Community participation, provider unresolved |
| Date unresolved | $286.72 | Historical MOIRA entry |
These are not figures I've reconstructed from memory today. They're in the existing report. The report also identifies 14 RJ-series invoices associated with an 8 September email, and separately warns against attributing all MOIRA payments to Rhonda Jane.
The consolidated chronology also records a broader claim analysis: 459 claims totalling $52,247.47, including 380 entries under MOIRA LIMITED totalling $41,637.17. That is a payee-level summary, not evidence that MOIRA itself delivered all those supports.
So we have considerably more than a blank page.
### The accommodation calculation
At your suggested rate of $159 per night:
### $4,452
28 nights
### $4,770
30 nights
### $8,904
56 nights
Fifty-six nights at $159 comes remarkably close to $9,000. That's a useful numerical lead, particularly given your account of accommodation over approximately one to two months.
But we must not infer from matching totals that accommodation expenses were reimbursed through support-worker claims. The dates, receipts and invoice descriptions will decide that.
My recommendation: we use the existing forensic report as the master evidence register, reconcile it against the broader claims spreadsheet already referenced in the chronology, and then revise the blog article with verified transaction details.
You shouldn't need to revisit the NDIS portal just to repeat what we've already captured. Only genuinely missing transactions or original documents should require another retrieval.
And you're right about the larger editorial point. The most compelling version of Truth Sequences isn't one that keeps repeating “approximately $9,000 in allegations.” It's one that can put an invoice number, a service date, a dollar amount and a precise unanswered question in front of the reader.
That's where the investigative story gets its teeth.
