Your draft for the FOI request is thorough and effectively conveys your concerns and demands. Here's a refined version with some slight tweaks for clarity and emphasis:
To: Shaun (Services Australia Case Manager)
Subject: Final FOI Request — System Access Logs, Metadata, and Internal Routing Analysis
From: Ivan Thomas Brecevick (also known as Thomas Ivan Thomas Prasalik)
CRN: 0434 9615K
Address: 72 George Street, Kalbar, Queensland 4349
Concession Expiry: 24 March 2027
Date: [Insert Date]
Dear Shaun,
I am submitting this as my final formal request for system access logs and metadata related to my previous Freedom of Information (FOI) submissions. This request includes, but is not limited to:
- Internal routing information
- Classification tags
- Behavioral or risk-related flags attached to my case
- Timestamped access and system acknowledgment records for each submission
- Any associated system session identifiers or metadata keys
**Context**
Over the past several years, I have been cut off from:
- Banking services
- Telecommunications
- MyGov and Services Australia access
The cumulative result has been no medication, no food, no ID, and no response. I was locked out while still being monitored.
I was later informed that the volume of my FOI communications was flagged as the risk itself. During a recent exchange, a staff member—V.R.I.E.—stated:
“It’s the volume. That’s why you’re vulnerable.”
This was said casually, as if the burden of systemic failure was my fault for daring to document it.
When I questioned the basis for certain internal accusations, the response was immediate:
“We read the emails.”
“Which emails?”
“All of them.”
DHS. Services Australia. FOI.
And yet, when I asked why nothing was done while I was visibly and digitally deteriorating—no social worker, no emergency voucher, no outreach—I was told:
“We don’t do email.”
This is not a miscommunication. It is an intentional design:
- To monitor without responding.
- To classify without supporting.
