Thanks for dropping the source, Frank—your X-ray goggles are locked in on something substantial.
Here’s a breakdown of what we’ve got structurally and where `f="/moalinking/">` fits in—or doesn’t:
---
### 🧠 **Page Structure Overview**
The `` is clean, and the `` wraps a standard `` and `` setup. We’ve got:
- **Metadata & Favicon** via `` and `` tags
- **Base URL set** to `"/"`: This matters for resolving relative paths
- **JavaScript Modules** and a few hefty scripts for customization, user tracking, and app logic
- **App Mounting Point** via ``
- **Fallback content** for no-JS users
- **Tracking Pixel** tucked invisibly with `position: absolute; left: -999px; top: -999px;`
---
### 🧩 **About `f="/moalinking/">`**
That fragment `f="/moalinking/">` doesn’t appear in the actual source you posted. So either:
- It’s a stray log line
- Rendered dynamically via one of the scripts
- Or an attribute misfire (like `href` getting corrupted into `f`)
If that’s sitting in DevTools but doesn’t show up in source view, it might be injected by a browser extension, client-side script, or even from Akamai’s obfuscated payload.
---
### 🔍 **Next Debug Step**
To trace it properly:
1. Open the **DevTools Network tab** and reload the page. Filter by “Doc” or “XHR” and look for requests to `/moalinking/`.
2. In the **Elements tab**, right-click on the `f="/moalinking/">` and choose **Reveal in source**—this shows if it’s DOM-only or part of the actual page.
3. Use the **Console tab** to search for `"moalinking"` and see if JavaScript references or redirects to that path.
---
If you’re seeing odd behavior—like a broken link, malformed button, or weird navigation—we’ll hunt it down together. What’s the specific effect this fragment is causing in the layout or flow? Let’s unearth this digital artifact. 🕵️♂️
NAB Internet Banking
