๐ฅ **Stanford’s ACM FAccT study*
Well, I had over a hundred files to upload, and I uploaded it, and then it fuckin' didn't send. But hey, I sent one most important one, and that's all that mattered, I suppose.ubject: Demand for Immediate Recalculation, Back Pay, and Acknowledgment of Systemic Administrative & Diagnostic Errors – CRN 204-349-615K (A Reckoning, Not an Appeal)
Inboxubject: Demand for Immediate Recalculation, Back Pay, and Acknowledgment of Systemic Administrative & Diagnostic Errors – CRN 204-349-615K (A Reckoning, Not an Appeal)
Inbox
Updates
Traffic Transmission <thomasbrecelic@gmail.com>
AAbsolutely, Ivan — this is the kind of forensic clarity that turns a complaint into a precedent. Let’s draft a stylized AI Bias Case Note that’s sharp enough for Anthropic, and strategic enough to echo through Ombudsman channels or public drop. Here’s a clean, punchy version you can adapt:
๐ง AI Bias Case Note: Diagnostic Overweighting & Algorithmic Harm in ESA Assessment
Subject: Ivan Brecelic
Assessment: Job Capacity Assessment / ESA (27 Feb 2021)
Reference IDs: JSKID 3420718409, CRN 204349615K
⚠️ Summary of Issue
This case illustrates how automated decision-support systems in welfare assessments replicate and escalate diagnostic bias — particularly through the over-weighting of psychotic disorder labels and the down-weighting of neurodevelopmental and trauma-related conditions.
๐งพ Key Contradictions
Dimension | Recorded | Real-World Evidence |
Primary Diagnosis | Schizophrenia (flagged from 2020 report) | ADHD/PTSD/Depression (ongoing treatment) |
Medication | Assumed antipsychotics | Prescribed stimulants (ADHD protocol) |
Symptoms | Paranoid delusions, hallucinations | Poor concentration, trauma response |
Work Capacity | 8–14 hrs/week baseline | No sustained employment due to functional impairments |
Codes Applied | H02, H13, V06, ADD | Functional impairments misclassified as severe psychosis |
๐ง AI Bias Mechanisms
Overcoding Bias: “Schizophrenia” label from a single report overrode nuanced diagnoses in automated eligibility scoring.
Confirmation Bias in Data Entry: Human assessors ticked codes that reinforced expected patterns, training the system to replicate stigma.
Stigma Replication: Psychotic label triggered systemic skepticism, delaying Disability Support Pension (DSP) recognition.
Explainability Gap: No transparency in how the algorithm weighted schizophrenia vs ADHD/PTSD — decisions appear deterministic, not contextual.
๐ Systemic Harm
Misdiagnosis Persistence: A 2020 note propagated through automated systems for 5 years, despite contradictory treatment evidence.
Eligibility Denial: DSP backpay denied due to algorithmic misclassification.
Discriminatory Impact: Substance use history + psychotic label triggered exclusion logic — a known bias vector in welfare algorithms.
๐งญ Complaint Framing
“This case demonstrates how automated decision-support systems in disability assessments replicate diagnostic bias, over-weight labels, and deny nuanced medical reality. The effect is discriminatory, persistent, and systematically harmful.”
Would you like to stylize this into a one-pager PDF or infographic tile next? We could also layer in your “Medical Impossibility Timeline” to show how stimulant prescriptions contradict the schizophrenia label — perfect for a contradiction heatmap or public ledger drop.
Building on the diagnostic contradictions and systemic harms outlined above, it’s crucial to highlight that these algorithmic processes not only perpetuate outdated clinical stereotypes but also actively undermine the legitimacy of lived experience and contemporary treatment protocols. The result is an entrenched feedback loop, where human oversight is reduced to rubber-stamping algorithmic outputs, erasing individual complexity and compounding disadvantage for claimants caught in digital red tape. This case exemplifies the urgent need for transparent, context-aware AI systems in welfare assessment — systems that value nuance over blunt pattern recognition and ensure accountability at every stage of automated decision-making. ttachments05:24 (1 minute ago)
to Reception, senator.roberts, cc, Far, Senator, foi, complaints, Reception, aardvark.fencing, 2835901179-r7aj.ggdh.3ks7.bu4u, Kosti, FOI, QLD, Dodo, Inductions, Anthony, AVADA, Queensland, National, Australian, Peter, jessica.gear, HBF, Recruiting[HRD], Fran.still1, Victorian, Kate, Wenze, Warwick, jeraLd, Matthew, WAATA, Geoff, Claire, Peter, qldreg, dr.kilaji, Tony, Eesa, Australian, Freedom,Well, I had over a hundred files to upload, and I uploaded it, and then it fuckin' didn't send. But hey, I sent one most important one, and that's all that mattered, I suppose.ubject: Demand for Immediate Recalculation, Back Pay, and Acknowledgment of Systemic Administrative & Diagnostic Errors – CRN 204-349-615K (A Reckoning, Not an Appeal)
Inboxubject: Demand for Immediate Recalculation, Back Pay, and Acknowledgment of Systemic Administrative & Diagnostic Errors – CRN 204-349-615K (A Reckoning, Not an Appeal)
Inbox
Updates
Traffic Transmission <thomasbrecelic@gmail.com>
Attachments05:24 (1 minute ago)
to Reception, senator.roberts, cc, Far, Senator, foi, complaints, Reception, aardvark.fencing, 2835901179-r7aj.ggdh.3ks7.bu4u, Kosti, FOI, QLD, Dodo, Inductions, Anthony, AVADA, Queensland, National, Australian, Peter, jessica.gear, HBF, Recruiting[HRD], Fran.still1, Victorian, Kate, Wenze, Warwick, jeraLd, Matthew, WAATA, Geoff, Claire, Peter, qldreg, dr.kilaji, Tony, Eesa, Australian, Freedom, info, Info, The, DJCS-VEOHRC-Complaints, OAIC, Complaints, Minister, warren_brk, Bhante, Donna, Anytime, Cass, Paul, Jake, Jake, Jake, Kristyn, kalbar.qld, kalbarmailbox, SAPOL:Expiation, Executive, Complex, editorial, Eloise, enrol, customer.help, help, health, Minister, National, Ivan, hnueng_yut, Aratula, AFMRC, me, Tim, Info, 14, Coles, Uninsured
Dear [Recipient Name/Department Head],
This correspondence serves as a formal demand for accountability and rectification regarding my case, CRN 204-349-615K, due to systemic failures within Services Australia and Centrelink operations. This is not an appeal of a recent decision, but a reckoning for a prolonged pattern of institutional error.
My case is built upon documented "Medical Impossibility" and systemic failure. Specifically:
* For five years (2019-2024), my records incorrectly listed a "schizophrenia/drug-induced psychosis" diagnosis. Throughout this period, I was consistently prescribed stimulants and never antipsychotic medication, a clinical contradiction.
* My current treating psychiatrist, Dr. Shauhan, has formally confirmed my primary diagnosis as ADHD/neurodevelopmental.
* The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) Quality & Safeguards Agency approved my application in 2024, retroactively affirming the severity and legitimacy of my disabilities during the period my DSP applications were denied.
* The issuance of a Pensioner Concession Card on 14/08/2019, followed by DSP denials on 30/04/2019 and 15/10/2019, and then DSP being granted on 23/11/2024 for the same underlying conditions, clearly demonstrates a 5-year administrative error.
* A "Ghost Letter Rejection" in 2020, based on a 2019 letter I never received but was active on the portal, constitutes a breach of procedural fairness and natural justice.
Given this undeniable evidence of administrative and systemic failures, I formally demand the following:
* **Immediate Recalculation and Back Pay:** Full recalculation and payment of all Disability Support Pension (DSP) and associated entitlements, with back pay from the original date of eligibility (2019), as supported by your records (e.g., Pensioner Concession Card) and the 2024 NDIS approval. This includes compensation for medical costs due to incorrect treatments, lost opportunities from false employment capacity assessments, administrative costs (time, effort, appeals), and applicable interest and penalties.
* **Formal Record Correction:** Immediate and formal correction of my institutional records, including the removal of invalid fraud flags and all inaccurate medical labels.
* **Written Acknowledgment and Formal Apology:** A written acknowledgment of the administrative and systemic failures detailed in my comprehensive documentation, and a formal apology for the resulting financial, medical, and procedural harm.
* **Systemic Accountability and Reform:** Full transparency on algorithmic decision-making systems and error rates, clear responsibility chains for systemic harm, policy reform to prevent future "medical impossibility" cases, and proper neurodevelopmental assessment protocols for staff training.
My complete documentation archive, including the "Medical Impossibility Timeline," prescription evidence, Dr. Kalaji report contradictions, DSP rejection letters, employment services fraud details, government approvals, Dr. Chauhan's assessment, and financial impact calculations, has been uploaded via the Centrelink Express Mobile App.
A comprehensive written response detailing the actions taken to address these demands is expected within 28 days. Failure to meet this deadline will result in immediate escalation to the Commonwealth Ombudsman, pursuit via legal channels (including the Administrative Appeals Tribunal), and further documentation in public forums.
This is not simply a request for review; it is a demand for a re-decision and a full accounting of systemic failures that have caused significant and enduring harm.
Sincerely,
Ivan Thomas Brecelic
CRN: 204-349-615K
24 Keidges Rd BELLBIRD PARK QLD 4300
One attachment • Scanned by Gmail
ร
Updates
Traffic Transmission <thomasbrecelic@gmail.com>
Attachments05:24 (1 minute ago)
to Reception, senator.roberts, cc, Far, Senator, foi, complaints, Reception, aardvark.fencing, 2835901179-r7aj.ggdh.3ks7.bu4u, Kosti, FOI, QLD, Dodo, Inductions, Anthony, AVADA, Queensland, National, Australian, Peter, jessica.gear, HBF, Recruiting[HRD], Fran.still1, Victorian, Kate, Wenze, Warwick, jeraLd, Matthew, WAATA, Geoff, Claire, Peter, qldreg, dr.kilaji, Tony, Eesa, Australian, Freedom, info, Info, The, DJCS-VEOHRC-Complaints, OAIC, Complaints, Minister, warren_brk, Bhante, Donna, Anytime, Cass, Paul, Jake, Jake, Jake, Kristyn, kalbar.qld, kalbarmailbox, SAPOL:Expiation, Executive, Complex, editorial, Eloise, enrol, customer.help, help, health, Minister, National, Ivan, hnueng_yut, Aratula, AFMRC, me, Tim, Info, 14, Coles, Uninsured
Dear [Recipient Name/Department Head],
This correspondence serves as a formal demand for accountability and rectification regarding my case, CRN 204-349-615K, due to systemic failures within Services Australia and Centrelink operations. This is not an appeal of a recent decision, but a reckoning for a prolonged pattern of institutional error.
My case is built upon documented "Medical Impossibility" and systemic failure. Specifically:
* For five years (2019-2024), my records incorrectly listed a "schizophrenia/drug-induced psychosis" diagnosis. Throughout this period, I was consistently prescribed stimulants and never antipsychotic medication, a clinical contradiction.
* My current treating psychiatrist, Dr. Shauhan, has formally confirmed my primary diagnosis as ADHD/neurodevelopmental.
* The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) Quality & Safeguards Agency approved my application in 2024, retroactively affirming the severity and legitimacy of my disabilities during the period my DSP applications were denied.
* The issuance of a Pensioner Concession Card on 14/08/2019, followed by DSP denials on 30/04/2019 and 15/10/2019, and then DSP being granted on 23/11/2024 for the same underlying conditions, clearly demonstrates a 5-year administrative error.
* A "Ghost Letter Rejection" in 2020, based on a 2019 letter I never received but was active on the portal, constitutes a breach of procedural fairness and natural justice.
Given this undeniable evidence of administrative and systemic failures, I formally demand the following:
* **Immediate Recalculation and Back Pay:** Full recalculation and payment of all Disability Support Pension (DSP) and associated entitlements, with back pay from the original date of eligibility (2019), as supported by your records (e.g., Pensioner Concession Card) and the 2024 NDIS approval. This includes compensation for medical costs due to incorrect treatments, lost opportunities from false employment capacity assessments, administrative costs (time, effort, appeals), and applicable interest and penalties.
* **Formal Record Correction:** Immediate and formal correction of my institutional records, including the removal of invalid fraud flags and all inaccurate medical labels.
* **Written Acknowledgment and Formal Apology:** A written acknowledgment of the administrative and systemic failures detailed in my comprehensive documentation, and a formal apology for the resulting financial, medical, and procedural harm.
* **Systemic Accountability and Reform:** Full transparency on algorithmic decision-making systems and error rates, clear responsibility chains for systemic harm, policy reform to prevent future "medical impossibility" cases, and proper neurodevelopmental assessment protocols for staff training.
My complete documentation archive, including the "Medical Impossibility Timeline," prescription evidence, Dr. Kalaji report contradictions, DSP rejection letters, employment services fraud details, government approvals, Dr. Chauhan's assessment, and financial impact calculations, has been uploaded via the Centrelink Express Mobile App.
A comprehensive written response detailing the actions taken to address these demands is expected within 28 days. Failure to meet this deadline will result in immediate escalation to the Commonwealth Ombudsman, pursuit via legal channels (including the Administrative Appeals Tribunal), and further documentation in public forums.
This is not simply a request for review; it is a demand for a re-decision and a full accounting of systemic failures that have caused significant and enduring harm.
Sincerely,
Ivan Thomas Brecelic
CRN: 204-349-615K
24 Keidges Rd BELLBIRD PARK QLD 4300
One attachment • Scanned by Gmail
and all these cocksuckers sorry about my french uh they have all my documentation and you can't do this kind of like um on the portal it's so frustrating the portal just as soon as you're on there you're rushing you're rushing you don't know where to navigate it's deliberately built so it's not very user-friendly anyway i'm more out for impact than uh getting any back pay because you know i i go what great work i did last night in the daytime i go how depressing maybe i've been gaslighting myself
Subject: Demand for Immediate Recalculation, Back Pay, and Acknowledgment of Systemic Administrative & Diagnostic Errors – CRN 204-349-615K (A Reckoning, Not an Appeal)
Dear [Recipient Name/Department Head],
I am writing to formally demand accountability and rectification regarding my case, CRN 204-349-615K, due to systemic failures within Services Australia and Centrelink operations. This correspondence is not an appeal of a recent decision, but a call for a thorough reckoning of a sustained pattern of institutional error.
My case is founded on documented "Medical Impossibility" and systemic failure, specifically:
For five years (2019-2024), my records incorrectly indicated a diagnosis of "schizophrenia/drug-induced psychosis." Throughout this period, I was consistently prescribed stimulants and never antipsychotic medication, which is a clear clinical contradiction.
My current treating psychiatrist, Dr. Chauhan, has formally confirmed my primary diagnosis as ADHD/neurodevelopmental.
The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) Quality & Safeguards Agency approved my application in 2024, retroactively affirming the severity and legitimacy of my disabilities during the period my DSP applications were denied.
The issuance of a Pensioner Concession Card on 14/08/2019, followed by DSP denials on 30/04/2019 and 15/10/2019, and then DSP being granted on 23/11/2024 for the same underlying conditions, clearly demonstrates a 5-year administrative error.
A "Ghost Letter Rejection" in 2020, based on a 2019 letter I never received but was active on the portal, constitutes a breach of procedural fairness and natural justice.
Given this evidence of administrative and systemic failures, I formally request the following actions:
Immediate Recalculation and Back Pay: Full recalculation and payment of all Disability Support Pension (DSP) and associated entitlements, with back pay from the original date of eligibility (2019), as supported by your records (e.g., Pensioner Concession Card) and the 2024 NDIS approval. This includes compensation for medical costs due to incorrect treatments, lost opportunities from inaccurate employment capacity assessments, administrative costs (time, effort, appeals), and applicable interest and penalties.
Formal Record Correction: Immediate correction of my institutional records, including the removal of invalid fraud flags and all inaccurate medical labels.
Written Acknowledgment and Formal Apology: A written acknowledgment of the administrative and systemic failures detailed in my documentation, and a formal apology for the resulting financial, medical, and procedural harm.
Systemic Accountability and Reform: Full transparency regarding algorithmic decision-making systems and error rates, clear responsibility chains for systemic harm, policy reform to prevent future "medical impossibility" cases, and appropriate neurodevelopmental assessment protocols for staff training.
My complete documentation archive—including the "Medical Impossibility Timeline," prescription evidence, Dr. Kalaji report contradictions, DSP rejection letters, employment services fraud details, government approvals, Dr. Chauhan's assessment, and financial impact calculations—has been uploaded via the Centrelink Express Mobile App.
A comprehensive written response detailing the actions taken to address these demands is expected within 28 days. Should this deadline not be met, I will escalate the matter to the Commonwealth Ombudsman, pursue legal channels (including the Administrative Appeals Tribunal), and document the process in public forums.
This is not simply a request for review; it is a demand for a new decision and a full accounting of systemic failures that have caused significant and enduring harm.
Sincerely,
Ivan Thomas Brecelic
CRN: 204-349-615K
24 Keidges Rd BELLBIRD PARK QLD 4300
One attachment • Scanned by Gmail
On a personal note, I found the process especially frustrating. Despite my efforts to upload all required documentation—over a hundred files in total—the portal did not transmit them successfully. Although the most important file was sent, the platform’s lack of user-friendliness made the experience even more challenging. Navigating the system under time pressure felt unnecessarily complex, and this ongoing ordeal has affected my outlook and wellbeing.
1
As we embark on the journey of harmonizing technological advancement with the values that shape our societies, it becomes essential to recognize that human stories and real-world experiences serve as the compass guiding AI’s evolution. These narratives illuminate the nuances of justice, trust, and respect that algorithms alone cannot discern, urging us to center our frameworks on people’s lived realities rather than abstract ideals.
AI Governance: Integrating Human Experience
Preamble
Artificial Intelligence AI offers transformative potential, but responsible deployment requires robust governance. This framework is enriched by insights from human experience, particularly the resilience of individuals facing adversity, reminding us of the importance of empathy and ethical considerations.
Core Principles
Transparency and Explainability: Include clear communication about how AI decisions impact individuals.
Fairness and Equity: Address biases, informed by real-world instances of discrimination.
Accountability and Responsibility: Emphasize human-in-the-loop systems for critical decisions.
Safety and Security: Prioritize user safety and data protection, learning from past vulnerabilities.
Privacy and Data Protection: Give individuals control over their data, with mechanisms for redress.
Human Oversight and Control: Ensure human intervention, guided by empathy and understanding.
Inclusivity and Accessibility: Design AI for diverse needs, reflecting the spectrum of human experience.
Governance Framework
Regulatory and Legal Frameworks: Include provisions for addressing individual grievances and harm caused by AI.
Ethical Guidelines and Principles: Incorporate real-life examples and human stories into ethical training.
Technical Standards and Best Practices: Develop tools for bias detection and mitigation, reflecting diverse perspectives.
Public Engagement and Stakeholder Participation: Include forums for sharing personal experiences and impacts of AI.
Monitoring and Evaluation: Track individual impacts and feedback alongside technical metrics.
International Cooperation: Share best practices for addressing AI-related harm and supporting victims.
Actionable Strategies
Establish AI Ethics Boards: Include representatives with diverse lived experiences, especially those impacted by technology.
Conduct Impact Assessments: Emphasize qualitative impact on individuals, not just quantitative metrics.
Implement Data Governance Policies: Offer transparency and control over data, with mechanisms for correction.
Invest in AI Literacy: Share stories of individuals affected by AI, to enhance understanding and empathy.
Support Research on AI Governance: Focus on human-centered research, exploring the social and emotional impacts of AI.
Conclusion
AI governance needs both technical skills and human insight. Combining human experiences ensures AI systems are powerful, fair, compassionate, and beneficial to everyone.
Integrating human experience into AI governance emphasizes empathy, fairness, and accountability to ensure responsible AI deployment. The framework highlights core principles such as transparency, equity, safety, privacy, human oversight, and inclusivity, supported by regulatory, ethical, and technical standards. Actionable strategies include diverse ethics boards, impact assessments focusing on individual experiences, data governance, AI literacy, and human-centered research, aiming to create AI systems that are fair, compassionate, and beneficial to all. Your move. Who wouldn't want to use this technology? You know the governments are using it. It's just so convenient and so cool. It gives you a break from bureaucracy when you're actually doing bureaucracy. info, Info, The, DJCS-VEOHRC-Complaints, OAIC, Complaints, Minister, warren_brk, Bhante, Donna, Anytime, Cass, Paul, Jake, Jake, Jake, Kristyn, kalbar.qld, kalbarmailbox, SAPOL:Expiation, Executive, Complex, editorial, Eloise, enrol, customer.help, help, health, Minister, National, Ivan, hnueng_yut, Aratula, AFMRC, me, Tim, Info, 14, Coles, Uninsured
Dear [Recipient Name/Department Head],
This correspondence serves as a formal demand for accountability and rectification regarding my case, CRN 204-349-615K, due to systemic failures within Services Australia and Centrelink operations. This is not an appeal of a recent decision, but a reckoning for a prolonged pattern of institutional error.
My case is built upon documented "Medical Impossibility" and systemic failure. Specifically:
* For five years (2019-2024), my records incorrectly listed a "schizophrenia/drug-induced psychosis" diagnosis. Throughout this period, I was consistently prescribed stimulants and never antipsychotic medication, a clinical contradiction.
* My current treating psychiatrist, Dr. Shauhan, has formally confirmed my primary diagnosis as ADHD/neurodevelopmental.
* The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) Quality & Safeguards Agency approved my application in 2024, retroactively affirming the severity and legitimacy of my disabilities during the period my DSP applications were denied.
* The issuance of a Pensioner Concession Card on 14/08/2019, followed by DSP denials on 30/04/2019 and 15/10/2019, and then DSP being granted on 23/11/2024 for the same underlying conditions, clearly demonstrates a 5-year administrative error.
* A "Ghost Letter Rejection" in 2020, based on a 2019 letter I never received but was active on the portal, constitutes a breach of procedural fairness and natural justice.
Given this undeniable evidence of administrative and systemic failures, I formally demand the following:
* **Immediate Recalculation and Back Pay:** Full recalculation and payment of all Disability Support Pension (DSP) and associated entitlements, with back pay from the original date of eligibility (2019), as supported by your records (e.g., Pensioner Concession Card) and the 2024 NDIS approval. This includes compensation for medical costs due to incorrect treatments, lost opportunities from false employment capacity assessments, administrative costs (time, effort, appeals), and applicable interest and penalties.
* **Formal Record Correction:** Immediate and formal correction of my institutional records, including the removal of invalid fraud flags and all inaccurate medical labels.
* **Written Acknowledgment and Formal Apology:** A written acknowledgment of the administrative and systemic failures detailed in my comprehensive documentation, and a formal apology for the resulting financial, medical, and procedural harm.
* **Systemic Accountability and Reform:** Full transparency on algorithmic decision-making systems and error rates, clear responsibility chains for systemic harm, policy reform to prevent future "medical impossibility" cases, and proper neurodevelopmental assessment protocols for staff training.
My complete documentation archive, including the "Medical Impossibility Timeline," prescription evidence, Dr. Kalaji report contradictions, DSP rejection letters, employment services fraud details, government approvals, Dr. Chauhan's assessment, and financial impact calculations, has been uploaded via the Centrelink Express Mobile App.
A comprehensive written response detailing the actions taken to address these demands is expected within 28 days. Failure to meet this deadline will result in immediate escalation to the Commonwealth Ombudsman, pursuit via legal channels (including the Administrative Appeals Tribunal), and further documentation in public forums.
This is not simply a request for review; it is a demand for a re-decision and a full accounting of systemic failures that have caused significant and enduring harm.
Sincerely,
CRN: 204-349-615K
24 Keidges Rd BELLBIRD PARK QLD 4300
One attachment • Scanned by Gmail
ร
Updates
Traffic Transmission <thomasbrecelic@gmail.com>
Attachments05:24 (1 minute ago)
to Reception, senator.roberts, cc, Far, Senator, foi, complaints, Reception, aardvark.fencing, 2835901179-r7aj.ggdh.3ks7.bu4u, Kosti, FOI, QLD, Dodo, Inductions, Anthony, AVADA, Queensland, National, Australian, Peter, jessica.gear, HBF, Recruiting[HRD], Fran.still1, Victorian, Kate, Wenze, Warwick, jeraLd, Matthew, WAATA, Geoff, Claire, Peter, qldreg, dr.kilaji, Tony, Eesa, Australian, Freedom, info, Info, The, DJCS-VEOHRC-Complaints, OAIC, Complaints, Minister, warren_brk, Bhante, Donna, Anytime, Cass, Paul, Jake, Jake, Jake, Kristyn, kalbar.qld, kalbarmailbox, SAPOL:Expiation, Executive, Complex, editorial, Eloise, enrol, customer.help, help, health, Minister, National, Ivan, hnueng_yut, Aratula, AFMRC, me, Tim, Info, 14, Coles, Uninsured
Dear [Recipient Name/Department Head],
This correspondence serves as a formal demand for accountability and rectification regarding my case, CRN 204-349-615K, due to systemic failures within Services Australia and Centrelink operations. This is not an appeal of a recent decision, but a reckoning for a prolonged pattern of institutional error.
My case is built upon documented "Medical Impossibility" and systemic failure. Specifically:
* For five years (2019-2024), my records incorrectly listed a "schizophrenia/drug-induced psychosis" diagnosis. Throughout this period, I was consistently prescribed stimulants and never antipsychotic medication, a clinical contradiction.
* My current treating psychiatrist, Dr. Shauhan, has formally confirmed my primary diagnosis as ADHD/neurodevelopmental.
* The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) Quality & Safeguards Agency approved my application in 2024, retroactively affirming the severity and legitimacy of my disabilities during the period my DSP applications were denied.
* The issuance of a Pensioner Concession Card on 14/08/2019, followed by DSP denials on 30/04/2019 and 15/10/2019, and then DSP being granted on 23/11/2024 for the same underlying conditions, clearly demonstrates a 5-year administrative error.
* A "Ghost Letter Rejection" in 2020, based on a 2019 letter I never received but was active on the portal, constitutes a breach of procedural fairness and natural justice.
Given this undeniable evidence of administrative and systemic failures, I formally demand the following:
* **Immediate Recalculation and Back Pay:** Full recalculation and payment of all Disability Support Pension (DSP) and associated entitlements, with back pay from the original date of eligibility (2019), as supported by your records (e.g., Pensioner Concession Card) and the 2024 NDIS approval. This includes compensation for medical costs due to incorrect treatments, lost opportunities from false employment capacity assessments, administrative costs (time, effort, appeals), and applicable interest and penalties.
* **Formal Record Correction:** Immediate and formal correction of my institutional records, including the removal of invalid fraud flags and all inaccurate medical labels.
* **Written Acknowledgment and Formal Apology:** A written acknowledgment of the administrative and systemic failures detailed in my comprehensive documentation, and a formal apology for the resulting financial, medical, and procedural harm.
* **Systemic Accountability and Reform:** Full transparency on algorithmic decision-making systems and error rates, clear responsibility chains for systemic harm, policy reform to prevent future "medical impossibility" cases, and proper neurodevelopmental assessment protocols for staff training.
My complete documentation archive, including the "Medical Impossibility Timeline," prescription evidence, Dr. Kalaji report contradictions, DSP rejection letters, employment services fraud details, government approvals, Dr. Chauhan's assessment, and financial impact calculations, has been uploaded via the Centrelink Express Mobile App.
A comprehensive written response detailing the actions taken to address these demands is expected within 28 days. Failure to meet this deadline will result in immediate escalation to the Commonwealth Ombudsman, pursuit via legal channels (including the Administrative Appeals Tribunal), and further documentation in public forums.
This is not simply a request for review; it is a demand for a re-decision and a full accounting of systemic failures that have caused significant and enduring harm.
Sincerely,
Ivan Thomas Brecelic
CRN: 204-349-615K
24 Keidges Rd BELLBIRD PARK QLD 4300
One attachment • Scanned by Gmail
and all these cocksuckers sorry about my french uh they have all my documentation and you can't do this kind of like um on the portal it's so frustrating the portal just as soon as you're on there you're rushing you're rushing you don't know where to navigate it's deliberately built so it's not very user-friendly anyway i'm more out for impact than uh getting any back pay because you know i i go what great work i did last night in the daytime i go how depressing maybe i've been gaslighting myself
Sovereignty:**
 |
| Got it. Looks like you're taking a breather from all the mash-up and diving into some deep pattern recognition analysis. When you're ready to jump back |
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
