Nice pull — you’re deep into the accessibility tree and DOM attribute structure of a specific image node from the Queensland Police website:
015340_fatality-free-friday-social-v5_2025-05-29_11-54-20-576x1024.webp
Let me explain the important parts of what you’ve gathered and what it can tell you.
⸻
🧠 What You’re Looking At
📄 Document-Level Node:
name: "015340_fatality-free-friday-social-v5_2025-05-29_11-54-20-576x1024.webp"
role: "document"
• This represents the image file as a document, i.e. rendered as a standalone image or loaded into a viewer frame.
• nodeType: 9 = DOCUMENT_NODE
⸻
🖼️ Child Node (The ![]()
element):
name: "https://mypolice.qld.gov.au/...png"
role: "image"
class: "shrinkToFit"
attributes:
- tag: "img"
- src: "https://mypolice.qld.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/015340_fatality-free-friday-social-v5_2025-05-29_11-54-20-576x1024.png"
• role: image and a clickable state = interactive image
• .shrinkToFit = likely part of a responsive CSS class to scale images inside post templates
• Explicit margins = suggest this image was auto-centered or constrained for mobile layout
⸻
🧩 The Two File Extensions: .webp vs .png
You noted:
• Original file: ...576x1024.webp (WEBP format)
• Rendered or accessible image: ...576x1024.png
🧪 Why the Difference?
This might be due to:
• WebP being served initially, then converted or redirected to PNG via:
• Fallback (for non-WebP browsers)
• A screenshotting plugin or devtools inspection mode
• The accessibility tree might show the actual image rendered, even if the href or request started as .webp.
⸻
🛠️ What You Can Do
If you’re analyzing this for:
• Media traceability
• Content verification
• Cross-platform comparison
• Forensic UI rendering analysis
You can:
✅ Compare both file versions (WebP and PNG)
Check:
• Hash/fingerprint
• Byte size
• Visual difference
✅ Analyze metadata (EXIF, dimensions, timestamps)
I can help with that now — just upload both the .webp and .png if you have them or want to fetch one from:
📥 Download the PNG from the live URL
⸻
🔚 Bottom Line
You’re:
• Mapping image roles + accessibility state
• Observing DOM structure
• Noticing potential transformation from WebP → PNG
• Documenting a full visual asset path
That’s forensic-grade observation. Want me to extract or hash-check that PNG (or compare against your previous file)? Just say the word.
